首页> 外文OA文献 >In Vitro Activity of Nystatin Compared with Those of Liposomal Nystatin, Amphotericin B, and Fluconazole against Clinical Candida Isolates
【2h】

In Vitro Activity of Nystatin Compared with Those of Liposomal Nystatin, Amphotericin B, and Fluconazole against Clinical Candida Isolates

机译:制霉菌素,脂质体制霉菌素,两性霉素B和氟康唑对临床念珠菌分离物的体外活性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated the in vitro activity of nystatin and liposomal nystatin against 103 Candida isolates to determine the effect of both time and medium on MICs. We also compared the nystatin MICs with those of amphotericin B and fluconazole. Testing was performed in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A microdilution methodology with RPMI 1640, RPMI 1640 supplemented with glucose to 2% (RPMI-2), and antibiotic medium 3 supplemented with glucose to 2% (AM3). While nystatin MICs were similar to or slightly lower than liposomal nystatin MICs in RPMI 1640 and RPMI-2, they were markedly higher than liposomal nystatin MICs in AM3. Use of AM3 and determination of the MIC after 24 h of incubation provided a slightly wider range of liposomal nystatin MICs (0.06 to >16 μg/ml). Under these conditions, the MICs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited of nystatin and liposomal nystatin were 2 and 1 μg/ml, respectively. Nystatin and liposomal nystatin in general showed good activity against all Candida spp. tested. Although the MICs of nystatin and liposomal nystatin tended to rise in parallel with the amphotericin B MICs, nystatin and liposomal nystatin MICs of 1 to 2 and 0.5 to 1 μg/ml, respectively, were obtained for seven and six, respectively, of nine isolates for which amphotericin B MICs were ≥0.25 μg/ml. No correlation between fluconazole and nystatin or liposomal nystatin MICs was observed. As amphotericin B MICs of ≥0.25 μg/ml correlate with in vitro resistance, these results suggest that liposomal nystatin might have activity against some amphotericin B-resistant isolates. In vivo testing in animal models is required for clarification of this issue.
机译:我们调查了制霉菌素和脂质体制霉菌素对103念珠菌分离株的体外活性,以确定时间和培养基对MIC的影响。我们还比较了制霉菌素MIC与两性霉素B和氟康唑的MIC。根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会M27-A微稀释方法,使用RPMI 1640,补充2%葡萄糖的RPMI 1640(RPMI-2)和补充2%葡萄糖的抗生素培养基3(AM3)进行测试。制霉菌素MICs类似于或稍低于RPMI 1640和RPMI-2中的脂质体制霉菌素MIC,但它们显着高于AM3中的脂质体制霉菌素MIC。孵育24小时后使用AM3和测定MIC,可提供更大范围的脂质体制霉菌素MIC(0.06至> 16μg/ ml)。在这些条件下,抑制90%分离株制霉菌素和脂质体制霉菌素的MIC分别为2和1μg/ ml。制霉菌素和制脂质体制霉菌素通常对所有念珠菌属都有良好的活性。经过测试。尽管制霉菌素和脂质体制霉菌素的MIC趋于与两性霉素B MIC平行上升,但九种分离株中分别有7种和6种分别获得了1至2和0.5至1μg/ ml的制霉菌素和脂质体制霉菌素MIC。两性霉素B MIC≥0.25μg/ ml。氟康唑和制霉菌素或脂质体制霉菌素MICs之间没有相关性。由于两性霉素B MIC≥0.25μg/ ml与体外抗药性相关,这些结果表明脂质体制霉菌素可能对某些抗两性霉素B的菌株具有活性。为了澄清这个问题,需要在动物模型中进行体内测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号